 John Kerry Lies about his Abortion Stand (63 views) Subscribe   
  From:  David (DavidABrown)    Feb-23 11:59 am  
To:  ALL   (1 of 15)  
 
  819.1  
 
by Deal Hudson

www.LifeNews.com Note: Deal Hudson is the editor of Crisis Magazine.

While the Democratic primary has gotten more interesting with Senator John Edwards' strong showing Tuesday in Wisconsin, it still looks like Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts will be
going head-to-head with President Bush in this fall's election.

This makes things interesting for voting Catholics -- after all,
Kerry likes to tout his Catholic faith to prospective voters. Of
course, this isn't always an easy thing to do, given the
senator's strong support of abortion.

His strategy for getting away with this, though, is the same one
used by so many "Catholic" politicians: He claims that while he's
personally opposed to abortion, he can't let his religious belief
get in the way of his policy-making.

In fact, he told a reporter for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that,
"What I believe personally as a Catholic as an article of faith
is an article of faith. And if it's not shared by a Jew or an
Episcopalian or a Muslim or an agnostic or an atheist or someone
else, it's not appropriate in the United States for a legislator
to legislate your personal religious belief for the rest of the
country."

Furthermore, Kerry's Deputy Communications Director, Dag Vega,
confirmed with us that the senator is "personally opposed" to
abortion while still remaining pro-choice publicly and
politically.

Now, the "personally opposed" nonsense is easy enough to answer, and many have done it before. Obviously, abortion isn't a matter of faith but a matter of the right to life that is promised every
American in the Constitution. You certainly don't have to be
Catholic -- or even religious -- to believe that.

But let's put all that aside for the moment...

What if I told you that John Kerry might not be telling the truth
about being "personally opposed"?

No, I'm not presuming to read Kerry's mind. In this case, I don't
have to... his statements on the matter speak for themselves. Not
only are they not the words of someone who considers abortion a
tragic necessity, but Kerry proves himself an ardent supporter of
the growth of the abortion industry, both here and around the
world.

But don't take my word for it. Have a look at what Kerry said at
last year's NARAL Pro-Choice America Dinner:

"I think that tonight we have to make it clear that we are not
going to turn back the clock. There is no overturning of Roe v.
Wade... There is no outlawing of a procedure necessary to save a
woman's life or health and there are no more cutbacks on
population control efforts around the world. We need to take on
this President and all of the forces of intolerance on this
issue. We need to honestly and confidently and candidly take this
issue out to the country and we need to speak up and be proud of
what we stand for."

Did you catch that? Not only should abortion be available to all
American women, all the time, but it should be used as a
population control valve around the world. And this is something
we should "be proud of." Not what you'd expect from someone who's "personally opposed" to abortion.

And this isn't an isolated comment...

From the Boston Herald on January 23, 2001: "I will not back away
from my conviction that international family planning programs
are in America's best interests. We should resist pressures in
this country for heavy-handed Washington mandates that ignore
basic choices that should belong to free people around the
globe."

Kerry's support for "international family planning programs" -- a
standard euphemism for "abortion" -- is an issue he's advocated
for some time. If Kerry is telling the truth about being "personally opposed" to abortion, why is he trying to spread it worldwide? That would be like me saying, "I personally oppose watching television, and it's about time we get a television in every home."

And then there's this gem from the 1994 Congressional record:
"The right thing to do is to treat abortions as exactly what they
are -- a medical procedure that any doctor is free to provide and
any pregnant woman free to obtain. Consequently, abortions should not have to be performed in tightly guarded clinics on the edge of town; they should be performed and obtained in the same
locations as any other medical procedure... [A]bortions need to
be moved out of the fringes of medicine and into the mainstream
of medical practice. And by the same token, if our children are
to be safe from the danger of fanaticism, tolerance needs to
spread out of the mainstream churches, mosques, and synagogues,
and into the religious fringes."

Abortion is simply "a medical procedure"? If that were true, then
on what grounds could he possibly be personally opposed to it? He
certainly doesn't seem to be struggling with the issue here. And
how exactly does he propose to "spread tolerance" to the
"religious fringes"? Presumably, he's referring to the people
who, as an article of faith, believe abortion to be immoral. But
doesn't he claim to be one of those very people?

It just doesn't look like John Kerry is telling the truth on
this. When he talks to Catholic and Hispanic groups, he plays up
his personal struggle with abortion and his respect for Church
teaching. But when his audience is less religious, he suddenly
turns into a pro-abortion crusader.

In the end, his "personally opposed" rhetoric doesn't fly...
Kerry clearly isn't personally opposed to abortion. It's just a
dodge he's using to pander to religious voters.

I wonder how many Catholics will fall for it.

 



David A. Brown
Basic Christian: Forum
www.BasicChristian.org

 
  
   Options  Reply Delete Edit   
Rate 
  
    
 


  From:  carla5010   Mar-6 3:53 pm  
To:  David (DavidABrown)    (2 of 15)  
 
  819.2 in reply to 819.1  
 
LOL. Most Catholics do not follow the pope's extreme stands on fertility issues anyway. :-) 
  
   Options  Reply Delete Edit   
Rate 
  
    
 


  From:  David (DavidABrown)    Mar-13 12:33 pm  
To:  ALL   (3 of 15)  
 
  819.3 in reply to 819.1  
 
Woman Tells John Kerry She Regrets Her Abortion, Staffer Destroys Her Sign

by Steven Ertelt
www.LifeNews.com Editor
March 12, 2004

Tampa, FL (LifeNews.com) -- As the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, Senator John Kerry backs abortion. But a woman in Florida who wanted Kerry to know she regretted her abortion says she is glad he saw a sign she carried at a recent campaign event -- even though his staff tore it up afterwards.

After watching the nightly news, Rebecca Porter had a dream envisioning herself letting Kerry know she had an abortion and regretted her decision.

Porter told LifeNews.com that she and a friend went to an event the Kerry campaign had scheduled in Tampa. She brought along a sign that simply read, "My abortion hurt me."

She hoped Kerry would see it, but knowing only a limited number of people were being allowed inside the event, her best prospects were to show it those attending.

"I almost didn't go because doubt and fear was beginning to set in," Porter said. "But I went to hold my sign for the people walking in. I did not go as a Bush supporter or as a Republican, but as a woman hurt by abortion."

Dozens of people walked by and saw her sign.

Some looked away. Wives talked with their husbands. Friends whispered to each other in hushed tones after passing by.

Other came to talk with her and Cindy, but few had anything negative to say. 

Porter tells LifeNews.com that one detractor told her he wished the abortion had killed her. His wife elbowed him in the stomach afterwards.

"There was no protest. We were not there to say anything. Just to let our signs speak for us -- and they did, powerfully," Porter, the Florida director of the Operation Outcry Silent No More, said.

The two women were finally able to go inside the event and stand at the back of the crowd. As Kerry finished his speech, he closed by saying he would guarantee that "women would have the right to choose" abortion.

Not long after, Porter made her way to an area where Kerry was shaking hands with a large group of people. She eventually found herself exactly where she hoped she would be -- a few feet away from the man some hope will be the next president.

She held up her sign.

"Then it happened," Porter explains. "He reached up to shake a hand in the back and his eyes went up to my sign. He read it and then he looked into the crowd to see who was holding it -- and he looked me directly in the eyes."

"I hope he saw my pain. I was not angry, just pleading with him to understand. You could see the shock and surprise on his face," Porter said.

But within seconds, a Kerry campaign staff member approached Porter and grabbed her sign. 

"You can't have that sign here," the Kerry staffer said.

The sign tore and Porter let go. After he had possession of it, the Kerry staffer "tore it to pieces" and walked away. "He wouldn't even let me have the pieces," Porter said.

LifeNews.com spoke with a Kerry press assistant who declined to comment. Officials with the Florida Kerry campaign did not return a phone call.

Onlookers were surprised by what they saw and expressed their disagreement. One man walked over to the two women, said he was pro-life and that what happened "wasn't right."

Looking back on her experience, however, Porter is not angry.

"I was not upset. I felt like I had done what the Lord had wanted me to accomplish," she says.

"I hope [Kerry will] remember my sign and my pain in my eyes. I know there were many people laying in their beds that night thinking about their abortions."

Related web sites:
Operation Outcry - http://www.operationoutcry.org

 



David A. Brown
Basic Christian: Forum
www.BasicChristian.org

 
  
   Options  Reply Delete Edit   
Rate 
  
    
 


  From:  David (DavidABrown)    Mar-19 7:06 am  
To:  ALL   (4 of 15)  
 
  819.4 in reply to 819.3  
 
John Kerry Campaign Won't Respond to Destroying Woman's Abortion Sign

by Steven Ertelt
www.LifeNews.com Editor
March 18, 2004

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- The campaign of Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry has refused to respond to requests for comment as to why a campaign staffer destroyed a woman's sign at a recent Kerry rally. Kerry saw Rebecca Porter's sign, saying "My Abortion Hurt Me," and a staffer tore it to shreds only moments after.

In an exclusive LifeNews.com story last week, Porter said Kerry was "shocked and surprised" to see her sign. She said a campaign official then took her sign and tore it to pieces. The same staff member destroy a similar sign brought by Porter's friend Cindy.

LifeNews.com has made four attempts to obtain comment from the Kerry campaign.

Kerry's Florida campaign office refused to comment on the situation saying the national headquarters in Washington fields all media calls.

Adam Abram, a press assistant at Kerry's national office, said he was unable to comment and would have to find a Florida campaign representative to respond to our request for an interview.

When the Kerry campaign failed to call back, LifeNews.com spoke with Abram two more times. On both occasions, Abram would not comment and would not provide contact information for a campaign representative who would.

Porter isn't pleased at the Kerry campaign's refusal to respond.

"I'm very disappointed that he will not acknowledge what happened at his rally," Porter told LifeNews.com

"As a presidential candidate for all the people -- including me -- I think he should speak to his staff and apologize to Cindy and I for their actions and guarantee that it won't happen again to other women."

Porter said other women may attend Kerry events to help him understand abortion's negative impact on women.

"My concern is for other women who may be planning on going to his other rallies. I don't want them to have their property destroyed either. I want their freedom of speech rights protected," Porter said.

Porter, who is the Florida director of Operation Outcry Silent No More, a group that helps women share how their abortions hurt them, said she si curious to know Kerry's thoughts about her sign.

"As a supporter of abortion rights, how does he feel about the fact that abortion does hurt many women and men," Porter told LifeNews.com. "Abortion takes the life of our children and leaves many very wounded individuals."

At the event, Porter made her way to an area where Kerry was shaking hands.

"Then it happened," Porter explains. "He reached up to shake a hand in the back and his eyes went up to my sign. He read it and then he looked into the crowd to see who was holding it -- and he looked me directly in the eyes."

"I hope he saw my pain. I was not angry, just pleading with him to understand. You could see the shock and surprise on his face," Porter said.

But within seconds, a Kerry campaign staff member approached Porter and grabbed her sign. 

"You can't have that sign here," the Kerry staffer said.

The sign tore and Porter let go. After he had possession of it, the Kerry staffer "tore it to pieces" and walked away. "He wouldn't even let me have the pieces," Porter said.




David A. Brown
Basic Christian: Forum
www.BasicChristian.org

 
  
   Options  Reply Delete Edit   
Rate 
  
    
 


  From:  David (DavidABrown)    Mar-27 10:20 pm  
To:  ALL   (5 of 15)  
 
  819.5 in reply to 819.1  
 
John Kerry Criticized for Voting Against Bill Protecting Pregnant Women

by Steven Ertelt
www.LifeNews.com Editor
March 26, 2004

Washington, DC (www.LifeNews.com) -- Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry is drawing criticism for his vote against legislation that would protect pregnant women by allowing federal prosecutors to charge criminals with an additional crime when they assault women and kill or injure their unborn child.

The U.S. Senate passed the bill, also known as "Laci and Conner's Law," on Thursday 61-38 and twelve Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, supported the legislation.

Pregnant women and the families of other women who have been victims of such violence strongly opposed the substitute measure and were upset that Kerry voted for it and against the bill.

"I'm appalled that Senator Kerry voted the wrong way," Carol Lyons of Kentucky, whose pregnant daughter, Ashley, and unborn grandson Landon were murdered in January, told the Washington Times. "He's running for president of the United States, and he doesn't believe there are two victims. ... I know my grandbaby was real ... I have two victims."

"Before politicians say that Conner was not really a victim of a crime, they need to think long and hard about whether they really want to say that," Sharon Rocha, Laci Peterson's mother, said.

In fact, voting against the violence against pregnant women bill was so important for Kerry that he rushed back to the nation's capital from the campaign trail -- making only his second appearance this year on the Senate floor.

"Apparently, John Kerry believes that if a criminal commits a federal crime that injures a pregnant woman and kills her unborn son or daughter, prosecutors should tell the grieving mother that she did not really lose a baby," stated National Right to Life Legislative Director Douglas Johnson.

Kerry was also criticized for voting against a substitute bill that the Senate also defeated. That legislation would have allowed additional prosecution for crimes against violence women but would not have acknowledged the baby as another victim.

On the other hand, President Bush is expected to sign the pro-woman measure into law soon.

In a statement issued after the vote yesterday, President Bush said, "Pregnant women who have been harmed by violence, and their families, know that there are two victims -- the mother and the unborn child -- and both victims should be protected by Federal law. I look forward to signing this important legislation into law."

In February, Kerry said he would oppose the violence against pregnant women bill because he claimed it would undermine abortion rights.

"This bill would clearly impact a woman's right to choose to terminate her pregnancy, as that right is set forth in Roe vs. Wade," Kerry said. He indicated he opposed "granting a fetus the same legal status in all stages of development as a human being."

However, the bill exempts abortions and abortions remain legal in the states that have similar laws.

A May 2003 Newsweek poll found that 84 percent of Americans believe that when both mother and child die, the attacker should be charged "for two murders instead of one," including 56 percent who believe this should apply "in all cases where a pregnant woman is murdered."

The bill found support from both pro-life and pro-choice voters.

Some 29 states have laws that allow the prosecution of criminals who kill or injure unborn children as a result of crimes against a pregnant woman. Sixteen of those laws protect unborn children throughout pregnancy. 


 



David A. Brown
Basic Christian: Forum
www.BasicChristian.org

 
  
   Options  Reply Delete Edit   
Rate 
  
    
 


  From:  David (DavidABrown)    Mar-30 8:02 am  
To:  ALL   (6 of 15)  
 
  819.6 in reply to 819.1  
 
Pro-Life Groups: Kerry Can't be Both Catholic and Pro-Abortion

by Steven Ertelt
www.LifeNews.com Editor
March 29, 2004

Washington, DC (www.LifeNews.com) -- Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry is coming under fire for backing abortion on one hand and saying he adheres to the Catholic faith on the other.

Kerry recently drew criticism for using Scripture to attack President Bush and taking communion while on a skiing trip in Idaho.

In his 2003 book, "A Call to Service," Kerry said "I am a believing, practicing Catholic, married to another believing, practicing Catholic." 

At the same time, he says the Catholic Church, which takes a strong pro-life position, shouldn't have authority to tell elected officials how to vote on abortion issues.

"I don't tell church officials what to do, and church officials shouldn't tell American politicians what to do in the context of our public life," Kerry said in an interview with Time posted on the magazine's Web site Sunday. 

Kerry told the magazine he acknowledges that his views on abortion are causing an uproar.

"People in Rome are becoming more and more aware that there's a problem of John Kerry and a political scandal with his apparent profession of his Catholic faith and some of stances, particular abortion," Kerry said.

But the Pope isn't the only leading Catholic troubled by Kerry's pro-abortion stance.

"John Kerry ... is going to have a very hard eight months," Father Frank Pavone, the national director of Priests for Life, told LifeNews.com. "The challenge consists precisely in explaining how one can claim to be a Catholic while denying what the Catholic Church has
identified as a central, unchangeable teaching."

Many pro-life Catholics say Kerry's embrace of abortion will cost him votes in November.

"A lot of Catholic right-to-life people, even if they like Kerry on other issues, would vote for Bush on that issue," Ohio Republican Congressman Bob Ney, a Catholic who grew up in a Democratic household, told the Cleveland Plain-Dealer.

Though Kerry took communion in Idaho on a recent vacation, one Catholic bishop said the candidate would be denied it if he visited churches in his diocese.

St. Louis Archbishop Raymond Burke said he would offer the politician a blessing rather than giving him full communion.


"I would have to admonish him not to present himself for Communion," said Burke. "I might give him a blessing or something. If his archbishop has told him he should not present himself for Communion, he shouldn't. I agree with Archbishop O'Malley."

Archbishop Sean O'Malley of Boston, where Kerry attends church, has told Catholic elected officials who are pro-abortion that they should not be receiving communion and that they should refrain from taking part in the Christian sacrament on their own.

Kerry was roundly criticized by the families of pregnant women who have been victims of violence and lost their unborn children as a result. He voted against the Unborn Victims of Violence Bill and for a substitute that says their children were not victims.

"I'm appalled that Senator Kerry voted the wrong way," Carol Lyons of Kentucky, whose pregnant daughter, Ashley, and unborn grandson Landon were murdered in January, told the Washington Times. "He's running for president of the United States, and he doesn't believe there are two victims. ... I know my grandbaby was real ... I have two victims."

"Before politicians say that Conner was not really a victim of a crime, they need to think long and hard about whether they really want to say that," Sharon Rocha, Laci Peterson's mother, said referring to Laci's son Conner, who also died.




David A. Brown
Basic Christian: Forum
www.BasicChristian.org

 
  
   Options  Reply Delete Edit   
Rate 
  
    
 


  From:  David (DavidABrown)    Apr-1 10:13 am  
To:  ALL   (7 of 15)  
 
  819.7 in reply to 819.1  
 
Leading Pro-Abortion Group Endorses John Kerry for President

by Steven Ertelt
WWW.LifeNews.com Editor
March 31, 2004

Washington, DC (www.LifeNews.com) -- As expected, one of the leading abortion advocacy groups announced yesterday that it has endorsed pro-abortion Massachusetts senator John Kerry, the presumptive Democratic nominee, for president.

"John Kerry will be a President pro-choice Americans can rely on," said Kate Michelman, president of NARAL. "He understands that our private lives are private, and will make sure that Roe vs. Wade remains the law of the land. Throughout his public life, Senator Kerry has been a leader on women's issues such as protecting the right to choose and preventing domestic violence."

The endorsement is no shock to Carol Tobias, the director of the National Right to Life political action committee.

Tobias told LifeNews.com that John Kerry is "a perfect fit for NARAL, so their endorsement comes as no surprise."

"John Kerry supports partial-birth abortion, he supports using tax dollars to pay for abortion, and he will only appoint pro-abortion judges to the Supreme Court," Tobias explained. Also, "Kerry just voted against making it a crime to kill or injure an unborn child during the commission of a violent federal crime."

Along with the endorsement, the pro-abortion group unveiled an "aggressive plan to protect the future of choice by defeating George W. Bush."

The organization says it will work to activate pro-abortion voters through a mix of television advertising, grassroots organizing and online advocacy.

NARAL will focus on trashing the Bush administration for seeking medical records of partial-birth abortions in order to defend the partial-birth abortion ban and prove that such abortions are routinely performed on healthy women and healthy babies.

NARAL will also warn its members that Bush has appointed numerous pro-life appeals court nominees and has the potential to appoint two new members to the Supreme Court if reelected.

"The choice for pro-choice voters is clear -- and the stakes could not be higher," Michelman added. "If George Bush is re-elected, the future of reproductive freedom is in the hands of someone who has violated women's privacy, criminalized women's medical choices and pledged to do everything in his power to restrict safe and legal abortion."

NARAL says it has a list of more than four million members from which to start fundraising and it will target the following 14 states to defeat Bush and elect Kerry: California, Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Washington and Wisconsin. 


 



David A. Brown
Basic Christian: Forum
www.BasicChristian.org

 
  
   Options  Reply Delete Edit   
Rate 
  
    
 


  From:  Hamilton109   Apr-8 3:25 pm  
To:  David (DavidABrown)    (8 of 15)  
 
  819.8 in reply to 819.7  
 
I was living in the Boston Area when Kerry was elected and know him well. His having it both ways is quite typical of MASS Catholic Pols. 
Perhaps the new Archbishop will have the moral guts to do what should have been done long ago, condemn them all as frauds and hypocrites, banning them from communion until they repent. 

Hamilton
 
  
   Options  Reply Delete Edit   
Rate 
  
    
 


  From:  David (DavidABrown)    Apr-8 5:39 pm  
To:  Hamilton109   (9 of 15)  
 
  819.9 in reply to 819.8  
 
Hi Hamilton,

 

Well stated!!

 

I hope so too.

 

Is it true that John Kerry pretended for several years to be Irish Catholic knowing full well that his Kerry name was changed for popularity reasons from his true Polish-Jewish name.

 

Just wonder if it is widely know in Mass.

 

God Bless you,
David

 



David A. Brown
Basic Christian: Forum
www.BasicChristian.org

 
  
   Options  Reply Delete Edit   
Rate 
  
    
 


  From:  Hamilton109   Apr-12 9:51 am  
To:  David (DavidABrown)    (10 of 15)  
 
  819.10 in reply to 819.9  
 
Okay this is COMPLETELY new to me. 
What info do you have on this? As anti-Semitic as Boston is, he would never have survived politically if he were not only not Irish, but actually of Jewish heritage. 

Yes, Super Liberal Boston is about as bigoted and racist as it gets. 
I never heard the words "jew" or "nigger" said in genuine hatred until I moved to Mass. 

I'd love to have your sources on this.
 
  
   Options  Reply Delete Edit   
Rate 
  
    
 


  From:  David (DavidABrown)    Apr-12 11:40 am  
To:  Hamilton109   (11 of 15)  
 
  819.11 in reply to 819.10  
 
Hi,

 

www.Newsmax.com has several articles where Kerry said in the congressional record that he is Irish and his Irish ancestry i.e. we of Irish heritage yet it is document and Kerry knows full well that he is form Poland and Jewish or something like that.

 

There is absolutely nothing wrong with being Polish & Jewish or whatever Kerry is the problem is when he misrepresents himself.

 

I thought it was interesting how far politicians can twist the truth and keep people in that dark.

 

Let me know if you need more info on this.

 

God Bless you,
David

 



David A. Brown
Basic Christian: Forum
www.BasicChristian.org

 
  
   Options  Reply Delete Edit   
Rate 
  
    
 


  From:  David (DavidABrown)    Apr-12 11:49 am  
To:  Hamilton109   (12 of 15)  
 
  819.12 in reply to 819.11  
 
Tuesday, Feb. 4, 2003 

Sen. Kerry: Jewish Roots, Not Irish 

Though many think that Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., has an Irish heritage, that's blarney. But it turns out he does have Jewish ancestry. 

Kerry says he found out about 15 years ago that his father's mother was Jewish. For years he tried to find out more about his mysterious paternal grandfather, Frederick Kerry, who made front-page headlines in 1921 when he fatally shot himself in Boston's Copley Plaza Hotel. 

The nosy Boston Globe hired a genealogist find out that Frederick Kerry was born Fritz Kohn to Jewish parents in what is now the Czech Republic. 

"This is amazing; that is fascinating to me," the senator told the newspaper. "This is incredible stuff. I think it is more than interesting; it is a revelation. 

"It has a big emotional impact, because it obviously raises [questions]. I want to know what happened, why did they do this, what were they thinking, what was the thought process, and why, once they got over here, why they never talked about it," he said. 

Does this mean that fellow White House wannabe Joe Lieberman will have to split the Jewish vote? Maybe not; Kerry's maternal relatives are Boston Brahmins. 

The Globe noted that many publications, including itself, had falsely described Kerry as "Irish-American," a big plus for politicians in Massachusetts. The senator insisted that he had tried to dispel that myth and not exploit it. 

Despite his extreme pro-abortion views, Kerry claims he is a Catholic, also a big plus for politicians in Massachusetts. American Life League, however, has named him one of the Senate's "Deadly Dozen: Wanted for Fraudulently Claiming Catholic Faith." 

 



David A. Brown
Basic Christian: Forum
www.BasicChristian.org

 
  
   Options  Reply Delete Edit   
Rate 
  
    
 


  From:  Hamilton109   Apr-12 4:36 pm  
To:  David (DavidABrown)    (13 of 15)  
 
  819.13 in reply to 819.12  
 
Thank you for posting the article. 
Ironically, as much as I find him a low-life, I can't fault him too much for decisions that his parents or grand parents made. After all there are TONS of people who are Jewish and don't know it, because someone decided to change a name, or just keep Jewishness a secret. 

If HE had changed his name, or denied that he was Jewish, that would be another matter. 

Hamilton
 
  
   Options  Reply Delete Edit   
Rate 
  
    
 


  From:  David (DavidABrown)    Apr-12 6:16 pm  
To:  Hamilton109   (14 of 15)  
 
  819.14 in reply to 819.13  
 
I agree however in his case he has admitted to knowing about it for 15 years and has likely always known and still he acts like he is Irish so it is a little different. I think the Irish are particular that the Irish come from Ireland.

 

God Bless you,
David



David A. Brown
Basic Christian: Forum
www.BasicChristian.org

 
  
   Options  Reply Delete Edit   
Rate 
  
    
 


   From:  Hamilton109   Apr-13 10:46 am  
To:  David (DavidABrown)    (15 of 15)  
 
  819.15 in reply to 819.14  
 
You will note however that the article gives him "plausable deniability" and while I don't really believe him, I can't nail him for NOT setting the record straight. 
As for being Irish, you can be a fourth generation native born American and be "Irish" especially if you are in Boston. 

All of this however is just a side light. Whatever the case of his Irishness, Jewishness, Martianness -- he is a moral blackhole, as are so many Liberal pols. 

I want a President that is not a moral nihilist. 

Hamilton 

 
  
   Options  Reply Delete Edit  
 
